Scientific Evidence that Nature Could Not have Produced the First Living Cell
"In 1953 Stanley Miller performed an experiment which rocked the world! He showed that passing a spark through a chosen mixture of gasses will form amino acids, the building blocks of proteins which are the main ingredients of living cells. Given an inch, a mile was taken. We were taught that lightning strikes provided the sparks that formed the amino acids which concentrated in an “organic soup,” and linked together to form proteins. These were claimed to have gotten together with DNA to form the first living cell.
But amino acids will not link together to form proteins! It was a bit like claiming that if bricks formed in nature they would get together to build houses. Proteins are so hard to make that in all of nature, they never form except in already living cells. Never! This scientific fact stands in stark contrast to what was taught..."
John Lennox Evolution or Design? Coding in the Cell
Why Evolution Cannot Produce Species
Concerning evolution from species to species:
"Most mutations are negative than those that are beneficial. The best you get is a ratio of 10,000 to 1. In other words, mutations will tend to drive species to extinction before it has an opportunity to naturally evolve.
Unless it has a truly enormous population size, more than a quadrillion, a body size less than one centimeter, and a generation time briefer than 3 months.
Now you can go to the field biologists. Where do you see speciation going on in the real world? They only see it for those species that match the mathematical limits. Those that don't, all they see is extinction." - Hugh Ross
Cambrian Explosion Debunks Evolution
"From nothing, we have almost everything, almost overnight, geologically speaking. Most of the major forms of animals appear suddenly in a geological sense.
In Darwin's theory, if you think of the branching tree, Darwin's branching tree with the common ancestor at the bottom, and the different modern forms of animals up top. You would have one form to begin with, then it would gradually diverge into slightly different forms, and more and more different, until you get the major differences that we see now.
The problem with the Cambrian Explosion is that all these major differences appear together at the same time, with no fossil evidence that they descended from this common ancestor."
Ravens, Crows, and Jays are the Smartest of the Non-Human Animals, not the Great Apes!
"Darwin said the properties of the human mind we get from naturalistic evolution. Because we are most physically like chimpanzee and orangutans, that must be where we got our properties of the mind. Nobody bothered to test Darwin's theory until just some years ago.
A Research group at UCLA and University of California San Diego decided to do an experiment on chimpanzees and a whole bunch of other animals; to see if Darwin was really right, that the chimp was the smartest of the animals.
What they discovered is Darwin was wrong. In fact, they titled their research paper "Darwin's Mistake". What they found is that the smartest of the non-human animals are the ravens, crows, and jays, all ranking smarter than the chimpanzees.
What they discovered, for example, is a wild raven, without any human training, can recover a tool, and use that to recover a very different kind of tool, and use that second tool to get a food treat. Whereas a chimpanzee can't do that. They can only do it if they've been trained for years by a Human being.
Another thing that they discovered is that ravens, crows, and parrots, show their greatest intellectual capability when they are emotionally bonded to a human being." - Hugh Ross
Sure, we share a lot of DNA with the Great Apes, but our brain structures are not similar. First note is that it's a medical benefit from God that we can use Apes to advance medicine for Human life. Even using the organs in apes for transplants in Humans, that's a big advantage. Our memory chemical path in our brain is actually identical to rodents, and not Apes. We obviously didn't evolve from rodents. But God made it that way so we can advance medicine by using rodents in test labs, instead of humans.
Evolution Vs. God Movie by Living Waters
Hear expert testimony from leading evolutionary scientists from some of the world's top universities:
• Peter Nonacs, Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UCLA
• Craig Stanford, Professor, Biological Sciences and Anthropology, USC
• PZ Myers, Associate Professor, Biology, University of Minnesota Morris • Gail E. Kennedy, Associate Professor, Anthropology, UCLA
A study of the evidence of vestigial organs, natural selection, the fifth digit, the relevance of the stickleback, Darwin's finches and Lenski's bacteria—all under the microscope of the Scientific Method—observable evidence from the minds of experts. Prepare to have your faith shaken.